12/15/2023 0 Comments Ted talk julia galefBut when confronted by contrary evidence, they sought excuses to dismiss or discount it. When the investigators found evidence that appeared to confirm Dreyfus’s guilt, they sought grounds for believing it. This, Galef points out, was a classic case of “motivated reasoning” employed to defend pre-existing beliefs and conclusions. When the treasonous letters leaking secrets to the Germans resumed, Dreyfus’s prosecutors reasoned that a new traitor had appeared who happened to have similar handwriting. Dreyfus was publicly shamed, stripped of his rank, and sent to a penal colony on the aptly named Devil’s Island for a life of solitary confinement. When a second expert contradicted the first, investigators found that the second had connections to Jewish bankers and decided he could not be trusted. Witnesses came forward to report that they had heard Dreyfus praise the German Empire, that they’d seen him gambling, that he kept mistresses despite being married and a handwriting expert matched Dreyfus’s scrawl to a damning piece of evidence. As the only high-ranking Jewish officer in the French military during the early 1890s, a particularly antisemitic period in France’s history, suspicion immediately fell on him when it was learned that a traitor had been leaking military secrets to the Germans. Some prior conviction concealed a blind spot and kept him from asking pertinent questions.Īlfred Dreyfus lost five years of his life to such a mistake. It’s a tale as old as time: A man thinks he’s being evenhanded in assessing something, only to later learn that bias had disfigured his evaluation. It’s easier than you think to fall into motivated reasoning Here are five more from Galef’s latest, The Scout Mindset.ġ. Among them are Stephen Hicks and Helen Pluckrose, for mucking around in the sewers of postmodernism and cataloging the causes of our predicament Virginia Postrel, Johan Norberg, Matt Ridley, and Steven Pinker, for reminding us of the importance of dynamism, the open society, progress, and enlightenment and more recently, social scientists and practitioners such as Adam Grant and Julia Galef for their tips and techniques on cultivating and preserving objectivity.Ī few months back, I shared six important lessons from Grant’s latest book, Think Again. Those few who are working to diagnose and cure our culture deserve our attention and appreciation. After decades of decay in our academic training grounds, radical identitarianism and other irrationalities are spreading with accelerating speed, and we are woefully short of thinkers capable of fighting them. Increasingly, the barbarians are not merely at the gates, but running the show in a vast swathe of humanities departments. University professors resign in frustration from what were once our bastions of rationality. Like always, we will end the event with a networking session where we can enjoy drinks and tapas for all (included in the ticket).Respect for reason has waxed and waned throughout history. Afterwards, we will be able to discuss among all about this subject. It will give us a basis in order to have a debate afterwards.Īfter watching the talk, Joan will give us a small introduction into the subject. We will start watching the TED Talk from Julia about the subject (video in English with Spanish subtitles). He will first give us a small introduction into the subject and will then be the moderator of the following debate. His research subject is associated with the psychological methods and, in general, with the global aspects of Methodology of Behavioral Science. Joan is Professor at the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Barcelona (Spain) and member of the Research Institute of Brain, Cognition and Behavior (IR3C). ![]() ![]() In order to help us finding answers to all these questions, we invited Joan Guardia, an expert in this subject. Why does this occur, why is our mind doing this to us? Joan Guardia ![]() ![]() In her TED talk, Julia Galef explains us using an example that we don’t believe certain truths in case we are convinced of the contrary. When your steadfast opinions are tested, Galef asks: “What do you most yearn for? Do you yearn to defend your own beliefs or do you yearn to see the world as clearly as you possibly can?” Are you a soldier, prone to defending your viewpoint at all costs - or a scout, spurred by curiosity? Julia Galef examines the motivations behind these two mindsets and how they shape the way we interpret information, interweaved with a compelling history lesson from 19th-century France. Perspective is everything, especially when it comes to examining your beliefs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |